Children pages 615 - 618

- T1 apartments, 3 registries, 3 children:

BARBER (1), BULLEN (1) and THORNHILL (1).

- T2 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

MCCORMICK (1), NAYLOR (1), SPEIRS (1), WEINBURGER (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

- T3 apartments, 1 registries, 1 child:

BARNES (1).

In the other apartments (T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 615 - 618:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

This will be the only day where the totals of # children between table and sheets differ, in the case by 1.

The subtotals for apartments T1 and T2 are not added up correctly.

Pages under analysis:

 

Children pages 619 - 622

- T1 apartments, 4 registries, 4 children:

BARBER (1), BULLEN (1), CARPENTER (1) and THORNHILL (1).

- T2 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

MCCORMICK (1), NAYLOR (1), SPEIRS (1), WEINBURGER (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

- T3 apartments, 1 registries, 1 child:

BARNES (1).

In the other apartments (T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 619 - 622:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

The subtotals for apartments T1 and T2 are not added up correctly.

Pages under analysis:

 

Children pages 623 - 626

- T1 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

BARBER (1), BULLEN (1), CARPENTER (1), NELSON (1) and THORNHIL (1).

- T2 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

MCCORMICK (1), NAYLOR (1), SPEIRS (1), WEINBURGER (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

- T3 apartments, 1 registries, 1 child:

BARNES (1).

In the other apartments (T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 623 - 626:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

The subtotals for apartments T1 and T2 are not added up correctly.

Pages under analysis:

 

Children pages 627 - 630

- T1 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

BARBER, SIMON (1), BULLEN (1), CARPENTER (1), NELSON (1) and THORNHILL (1).

- T2 apartments, 6 registries, 6 children:

BROOKS (1), MCCORMICK (1), NAYLOR (1), SPEIRS (1), WEINBURGER (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

- T3 apartments, 1 registries, 1 child:

BARNES (1).

In the other apartments (T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 627 - 630:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

The subtotals for apartments T1 and T2 are not added up correctly.

Pages under analysis:

 

Children pages 631 - 634

- T1 apartments, 5 registries, 5 children:

MULLARD (1), NELSON (1), NEWMAN (1), PARKER (1) and PRICE (1).

- T2 apartments, 10 registries, 10 children:

ALLAN (1), ARUNDEL (1), BERRY (1), BROOKS (1), BURDEKIN (1), HYND (1), MORTIMER-BALL (1), PEART (1), WILKINSON (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

In the other apartments (T3, T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 631 - 634:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

The subtotals for apartments T1, T2 and T3 are not added up correctly.

Pages under analyisis:

 

Children pages 635 - 638

- T1 apartments, 6 registries, 6 children:

BLACK (1), MULLARD (1), NELSON (1), NEWMAN (1), PARKER (1) and PRICE (1).

- T2 apartments, 11 registries, 12 children:

ALLAN (1), ARUNDEL (1), BALLINGER (2), BERRY (1), BROOKS (1), BURDEKIN (1), HYND (1), MORTIMER-BALL (1), PEART (1), WILKINSON (1) and WILLIAMS (1).

In the other apartments (T3, T3F, T4, T3FP and T3FB) no # children are listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and children per apartment type):

This is what the computer has listed as the addition for children listed on pages 635 - 638:

This is the difference in terms of number of children between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

The subtotals for apartments T1, T3 and T3F are not added up correctly.

Pages under analysis:

 

Adults pages 615 - 618

- T1 apartments, 62 registries, 140 adults:

ALLISTER (1), AUSTIN (1), BAMFORTH (2), BARBER (2), BENTON (2), BLACKBURN (2), BRAIN (2), BULLEN (2), BURCH (2), BURLTON (3), CAIRNS (2), CARPENTER (3), CARRUTHERS (2), CLODE (2), COX (3), DOWNHAM (2), ELSON (2), FOSTER (3), FRANCIS (4), HALL (2), HALLAM (2), HAMILL (2), HANDY (3), HARDING (2), HART (2), HART (2), HESELTON (3), HULME (2), IAN (2), IRWIN (2), JENSEN (2), KNAGGS (2), LEE (2), MACKENZIE (3), MANN (4), MARKWARNER.CO.UK (1), MASULO (2), MCNAMARA (2), MILLS (3), MILNES (2), NEWMAN (1), OBRIEN (4), O'DONNEL (4), OLDFIELD (3), PATEL (4), PLANE (2), PLUMBEY (2), PRESTON (2), REAP (2), ROSE (2), ROWBOTHAM (3), SCHARFENBERG (2), SEVEN EYE/WESSELS (1), SIMPSON (2), SPERREY (2), STALLION (2), TALBOT (2), TAYLOR (3), THE TRAVEL CLUB UPMINSTER (2), THOM (2), THORNHILL (2) and VOISIN (2).

- T2 apartments, 55 registries, 150 adults:

AGG (2), BAKER (3), BAMFORD (2), BEAUMONT (2), BERRY (4), BOWNESS (2), BURTON (2), BXBER (2), CHARTERS (4), CLAYFIELD (3), CLIFFORD (4), CRONIN (2), DAVIES (3), EATON (3), EDMONDS (4), ENGLAND (2), GORROD (3), GRANT (3), HACK (2), HAMMERSLEY (2), HILLS (2), HYND (5), JANCZUR (4), KASSIRI (5), KELLY (1), KERR (2), KNOWLES (2), LEEDS (2), LEWARDOWSKI (4), LORDAN (2), MCCABE (4), MCCANDLESS (2), McCANN (5), MCCORMICK (2), MCLENNAGHAM (2), MCPHILIPS (2), NAYLOR (3), NAYLOR (2), OGDEN (2), OON (2), OSBORNE (2), PALMER (1), PATEL (2), PAYNE (5), SELF (3), SKINNER (2), SPEIRS (2), STEVENS (3), THOMAS COOK REPS (2), THOMPSON (3), TOTMAN (4), TULIP (2), WATKINS (2), WEINBURGER (3) and WILLIAMS (5).

- T3 apartments, 7 registries, 29 adults:

ARENDS/BOXTEL (8), BARNES (2), CLOUGH (5), HURST (6), KEVIN (2), MCGARRY (2) and PLUMB (4).

- T3F apartments, 2 registries, 5 adults:

BOOKER-MILBURN (4) and MORGAN (1).

- T3FB apartments, 1 registry, 2 adults:

RABIN (2).

- Other apartment (TZ), 1 registry, 2 adults:

TAVERNER (2).

- Unknown number of people of registry, so not taken into account:

DUNFORD.

In the other apartments (T4 and T3FP) no # adults is listed.

The above information can be summed up in the following table (number of registries and adults per apartment type):

These are the values the Ocean Club computer added up for number of adults listed on pages 615 - 618:

This is the difference in terms of number of adults between what computer has added up and what is listed on sheets:

Except the T4, no other apartment type (T1, T2, T3, T3F, T3FP and T3FB) is added up correctly.

Note we are not counting the DUNFORDs, they would make the difference bigger.
 
72 of 328 adults are not accounted for by the computer. That's 21.95% of adults being disregarded. Or to put in anther way, there were more 28.13 % of adults than the 256 computer says there were.

Pages under analysis: